To Site Menu | To Footer and UMD Index | To Main Content | Text-Only
University of Massachusetts DartmouthUMD IndexAsk UMDUMD Personnel DirectoryCOIN - Corsair Online INformation
Nav links: To Header | To Footer and UMD Index

Nav links: To Header | To Footer and UMD Index

Center for Educational Advancement

Team Debates
HST115: U.S. History

Joyce J Ballard

Purpose:

Debating historical issues encourage students’ cognitive skills such as reasoning and analysis. Furthermore students must have a firm grasp of the material in order to produce a strong and cohesive argument. Debates also foster confidence and verbal skills.

Description:

The U.S. History debates pitted Northern Vs. Southern ideology on three major issues: Slavery, the Fiery Fifties, and the Civil War. Students made up six teams of eight. Two teams at a time engaged in a debate, each representing the view of either North or South and expressed their political, social and economic ideas on one of the above issues. As an issue was raise, for example, the validity of morality as argument either against or in support of slavery, each student was allowed to express their sectional view. Students had divided the issues within each team according to who would defend or challenge which political, social, economic or intellectual aspect of their argument. Each team presented an overview of their case and then debated its virtues with the opposition. When the debate ended, each taking a full class period, students in the “audience” took a class vote to determine the “winner” of the debate. Each debater then presented a paper two-three pages long stating their case. Each member of the “audience” handed in a one-page paper during the following class to critique the debating teams. Therefore each student debated one time and observed two additional debates.

Result:

Overall, I was pleased with the classroom debates. Students in the first debate were somewhat hesitant and unsure of how to proceed but the class as a whole benefited by the critique papers of the “audience.” The result was that the second two groups were more articulate and decisive in their arguments. Student papers also showed a marked improvement in each succeeding paper as they grasped the concept of the process and gained confidence in their ability to criticize productively. I would implement this strategy in my freshman class again in the future.



 Last Updated On: 4/20/04

UMD Home

An Official UMass Dartmouth Web Page/Publication. © 2008 Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts.
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth• 285 Old Westport Road • North Dartmouth, MA 02747-2300
Phone: 508 999-8000 • TTY/TDD: 508 999-9250 • Contact the university

End of content. Go back to the top.