To Site Menu | To Footer and UMD Index | To Main Content | Text-Only
University of Massachusetts DartmouthUMD IndexAsk UMDUMD Personnel DirectoryCOIN - Corsair Online INformation
Nav links: To Header | To Footer and UMD Index

Nav links: To Header | To Footer and UMD Index

Center for Educational Advancement

Applying the "Learning Cycle Wheel" to Introduce Aims and Methods in Sociology
BRF107: Introduction to Humanities and Social Sciences

Amy Parelman

Purpose:

This unit is meant to introduce students to the discipline of sociology and to the scientific method as used in the field. To play to the varying strengths or "learning styles" of each student, the "learning cycle wheel" helped guide the selection of activities for the unit.

Description:

Briefly, the learning cycle wheel is a planning device that suggests offering classroom activities in the following order to include all students' learning strengths:

  1. Discussion of Concepts (Teacher motivates, witnesses; teacher/student interact)
  2. Information Method (Teacher "teaches"; teacher acts)
  3. Coaching Method (Teacher coaches, facilitates; students react)
  4. Self-Discovery Method (Teacher evaluates, remediates; student/teacher interact)

Therefore, the following activities took place during this unit:

  1. Trash Can Detectives: As I pulled objects out of a bag supposedly full of items I'd found in someone's trash can, the students had to hypothesize then draw conclusions about whose trash they were looking at. With each new piece of evidence revealed, they had to alter their conclusions and develop new hypotheses. We related this to scientific and sociological investigations.
  2. Students read "38 Who Saw Murder" about a famous incident in NYC in which 37 people witnessed a murder but didn't call the police. We also read a brief introduction to sociology. We then considered what in this situation would pique sociologists' interest and what they might seek to investigate. Certain concepts such as "herd mentality" and humans as social animals were introduced and explored.
  3. Student groups were asked to complete sociology experiments. They were to form jointly a hypothesis regarding, for example, what a group of students in the lunchroom would do if a stranger came to sit in their midst, or who typically starts and maintains conversations between men and women. (I provided many of the problems.) They were then to test their hypotheses by collecting data. Students wrote up their results in lab report form, evaluating their data and discussing its causes.

Note: One further assignment during the week students were gathering data was to read an article outlining Stanley Milgram's famous experiment about the lengths we'll go to adhere to authority. We considered the sociohistorical and psychological implications, but we also looked at the experiment design.

  1. Group presentations: The students revealed their findings in a formal presentation to the class. The class asked questions about their findings, their manner of data collection, the soundness of their conclusions, etc.

Results:

Most students found the subject matter compelling and began to develop an understanding of the aims and methods of sociology through these various activities. Because the activities were so varied, almost all found a way to connect with the topic at hand. Reports went well, but we needed to spend more time setting up the experiments. Further discussion about controlling variables and more input on my part regarding their experiment designs before they conducted them would have resulted in more significant results.



 Last Updated On: 4/20/04

UMD Home

An Official UMass Dartmouth Web Page/Publication. © 2008 Board of Trustees of the University of Massachusetts.
University of Massachusetts Dartmouth• 285 Old Westport Road • North Dartmouth, MA 02747-2300
Phone: 508 999-8000 • TTY/TDD: 508 999-9250 • Contact the university

End of content. Go back to the top.