|
THIS WEEK IN UMASSD HISTORY
 TORCH ARCHIVES: April 17, 1984, This photo shows the completion of the construction to the observatory in 1984.
Accreditation member meets with students
Original article by; Donna Harris
Friday April 18, 1980
Last Tuesday, Kathelleen Bouchard, a member of the Accreditation Team, met with approximately fifteen SMU students to discuss such issues as the role of student organizations, student participation at SMU, and the all important issue of funding.
Citing a participation problem, Dave Shore (one of the 15 students in attendance) said, “these individuals are of a very selective group; they are representative of a very active minority at SMU.”
Of the students that attended the meeting, four were Student Senators, two were SAP co-directors, three were Torch representatives, two represented WUSM, and one spoke for RHC. The remaining three individuals were independent of organization affiliations.
The students agreed unanimously that if a student wanted to get involved all the opportunities were there. Bill McGowan, Senate President, stated that the rewards for getting involved are immense. He commented, “You meet a lot of people that you wouldn’t meet academically.”
Karen Dorshimer, co-director of SAP (Student advisor program), commented on commuters’ involvement with organizations, stating that “She didn’t feel alienated by not being on campus, but after all, it is up to the individual student.”
Dorshimer stated that of the 90 students in SAP, approximately 1/4 live off campus, with the remaining 3/4 listed as dorm residents. Just the opposite situation was noted by Torch Representative, Dan MacAlpine, who stated that 4/5 of the editorial positions are held by off-campus students. MacAlpine, Torch News Editor, added that “the potential for student involvement is immense. However, I feel students don’t take full advantage of this involvement. The fault lies with the students, not with the university.”
The group continued the meeting with a discussion of the biggest concerns of every student. The main problem that everyone agreed upon was the lack of funding. All other problems seemed to stem from this one.
The trend to get rid of upper level courses appeared to be a big problem that stemmed from the inadequate funding problem. MacAlpine stated that this was especially the case in upper level english courses.
Another major issue that was recognized by the group was the availability of both the professors and the administration. Jodi Baum, RHC President, emphasized the walk-in office hours of President Walker, enabling anyone to approach him, while Mac Alpine stressed the continuing availability of the professors. The group stated that the professors were also very open about talking to the students on a personal level, not just the strict career counseling.
Of all the topics discussed by the group, the only one that emphasized discontent was the health Services Program. Students voiced a unanimous disapproval with the way in which Health Services are conducted.
Karen Dorshimer summed up the group’s feelings by stating, “The Health Services are inadequate, and sometimes incompetent.” She addressed the situation of over-prescription of drugs by the SMU personnel.
Baum also added that the manner of certain personnel appeared to be condescending, especially in the case of one individual who was universally singled out by the group. Students stressed the need for re-evaluation of the Health Services and staffed weekend hours.
The meeting concluded with Bouchard adding her positive opinions emphasizing the positions of the student views presented at this discussion.
Trustees vote in favor of HECC Proposal despite student protest
Original article by Laura Stout
April 19, 1996
“If you do not reject these proposed restrictions” said Tyson Rose, “you will be denying the people of Massachusetts their right to quality education, denying the principles of diversity, and submitting control of our public University to the independent agency that is HECC.”
Rose. A senior Civil Engineering major and College Now student addressed the University of Massachusetts Board of Trustees last their meeting last Thursday April 11. The Trustees had assembled at UMass Dartmouth’s residents’ cafeteria in order to vote on several issues, including the acceptance or rejection of the Higher Education Coordinating Council’s [HECC] proposal to raise admission standards at UMass. [See “Student’s say HECC no!” in last week’s issue of the Torch.]
If the HECC standards were implemented, an estimated 18.5% of the total incoming freshmen class would be denied access to the University. But on closer inspection, of those 18.5% of students declined by the University, 63.5% of incoming students of color would be denied equal access. The result: about one out of every five incoming freshmen could be rejected, while a disproportionate 2 out of every 3 incoming students of color could be affected.
In order to prevent this seeming contradiction of UMass Dartmouth’s admission policy, which states its intention to “pursue and graduate a student body that reflects the increasing racial and ethnic diversity of the college eligible population of the common-wealth,” a group of concerned students picketed the Board of Trustees, voicing their concerns.
Approximately sixty students, members of the Progressive Student Alliance (PSA), the Womens’ Center and United Brothers and Sisters (UBS), along with representatives from the Frederick Douglass Unity House joined forces to combat the proposed changes. Rallying outside the residents’ café with picket signs reading, “Support Diversity” and “HECC standards support elitism,” the students joined the Trustees’ meeting in order to address the Board.
After Chancellor Cressy gave a preliminary welcome address, newly instated UMass System President, William Bulger (on his first visit to UMass Dartmouth since his appointment) extended a few words of congratulations to the winning UMass basketball team. The board then accommodated the student picketers by moving the HECC vote to the top of the agenda. Student Trustee, Matthew Morrissey asked that Tyson Rose be recognized by the Board in order to speak on behalf of UMass students.
Rose clearly and concisely voiced the students’ concerns about the HECC proposal in his speech. Students’ concerns were trifold.
First, students were concerned with the impact that HECC’s proposal would have on the University’s ability to provide access and live up to its own mission statement to “Encour[age] and support [...] the educational aspirations of under represented student populations, thereby increasing the diversity of the campus community.” Rose claimed that the HECC proposal would hinder the University’s efforts to increase diversity by “locking out” students of color and students with low socio-economic backgrounds.
The second concern that rose addressed was that “The SAT has not proven to be an accurate determinate of success, but has proven time and time again to be culturally, economically, and gender biased.” He assured the board that “We are all for higher standards but we support standards that are a true determinate of the drive, motivation, and ability of a student.”
The third and final problem Rose addressed was the method by which these standards being administered. “Any changes that are made to admissions standards ust be arrived at through a democratic process involving students, faculty and administration, rather than being handed down by a committee which not accountable to those whom its decisions will affect most,” said Rose, who then presented to the Board a petition, signed by seven-hundred and fifty students who oppose the HECC changes.
The conclusion of Rose’s speech was met with cheers of approval by the assembled students. However, the cheers soon turned to jeers when the Board voted to approve the HECC standards despite student efforts. The final vote was 10 votes in favor of the HECC changes, 3 votes opposed, and two abstentions.
Though the outcome was disappointing to many students, they were not ready to give up. Senior history major and organizer of the PSA, Brian Sherry said, “We understood that it would be a hard fight going in,...the fact that we changed some peoples’ minds is a good sign.”
Sherry continued, “I think many of the Trustees aren’t informed as to what impact the standards would have on the student body.”
“The students took some solace in the fact that the Board agreed to review the HECC standards again next year and take another vote based on the affect the standards would have on this years’ freshmen.
Sherry gave voice to the larger implications of the student protest, “Regardless of the result, the coalition that was formed between the PSA, the Women’s Center, and UBS is unprecedented...we intend to continue the effort together. More than anything else,” said Sherry, “that was the biggest victory.”
|