|
Debate team tackles divisive issue of the century
Students discuss the ‘beirut’ vs. ‘beer pong’ controversy
By Anita Sue Donym
Students filled the Main Auditorium to capacity on Tuesday, April 1, to witness the inaugural gathering of the university’s newly created debate team, the UMass-ter Debaters (UMD).
Seniors Bobby Carmichael and Clyde McFlannery, who have been roommates since their freshman year, co-founded the debate team after a night of heavy thinking and deep conversation.
McFlannery explained before the event, “We were sitting around, sippin’ on some divine Natural Ice, when I was like, ‘Yo, wanna play beirut?’ I’ve never seen Bobby so pissed. He was like, ‘Yo, dude, what did I tell you? It’s called beer pong!’”
In that instant, the two made a pact not to graduate until the dispute had been settled in a mature, educational manner. “Actually, I might not graduate anyway,” Carmichael noted. “I’m on academic probation for my fifth semester in a row.”
Students came out in droves for the event, filling the auditorium and its balconies. Hundreds more were turned away at the door, but demanded admittance. Fearing a revolt, the Tech Crew scrambled to set up a live closed-circuit broadcast of the event that students could watch from the library.
Librarian Eloise Snively commented, “That’s the most students I’ve ever seen in the library at once.” Adjusting the spectacles resting on the tip of her nose, she added, “I had to call in the librarian reserves to patrol the floors and shush anyone being too noisy.”
Back in the Main Auditorium, the raucous crowd hushed as the lights on the stage went up, revealing two podiums and an American flag backdrop.
As Carmichael and McFlannery took the stage for the inaugural debate of the UMass-ter Debaters, they received a standing ovation. One unidentified student wiped away tears and smiled, “This is what freedom of speech is all about!”
Carmichael, representing “pro-beer pong,” opened the evening with a strong argument. “You should call it ‘beer pong’ because you play the game with a ping pong ball, not a beirut ball,” he sneered. “Those don’t even exist.”
Representing “pro-beirut,” McFlannery quickly countered, “Yeah, but you know who plays ping pong? Forrest Gump.”
This back-and-forth debate kept the audience on the edge of their seats. The professionalism of the presentations impressed many, especially the Public safety officials who were asked to keep an eye on the event.
Throughout the evening, many students cheered to show their agreement with a particular statement. But by the sounds of it, even the audience was largely split or undecided on the issue.
Sophomore English major Joanie Mansfield explained her indecision: “They really made me think, you know? Like, Clyde totally had me when he described how sophisticated ‘beirut’ sounds. But then Bobby was like, ‘Dude, what is a beirut?’...and I had to agree that I didn’t know.”
Frank Garrison, a senior business major, explained, “I’m pretty sure Beirut is a country or something. But, like, did Beirut come up with the game? ‘Cause if they did, I’d say that gives them naming rights.”
Stacey “Bo” Bacey, an undeclared freshman, said it best when she commented, “Dude, woah.”
Woah, indeed.
At the end of the four-hour debate, it was apparent that a mature discussion wouldn’t solve any problems. In front of a shocked audience, Carmichael and McFlannery agreed to disagree, adding that they should patch their sullied friendship over a pint at the UMD Pub.
The two also agreed that the UMass-ter Debaters had served its purpose and would never hold another debate on campus. As McFlannery explained, “We’ve already gone head-to-head over the most divisive topic of our time. What else would be left to talk about?”
Carmichael suggested the possibility of a “Your Mama / No, Your Mama” debate but felt that pursuing the idea would be counterproductive. “Seriously, either way, it’s someone’s mama,” he said, “and we just don’t want to go there.”
|