Skip to main content

APEX Handbook

1. Overview

The APEX (Academic Project or Experience) is the culmination of Honors education at UMass  Dartmouth. Every student in the Honors College must complete an APEX to graduate as a  Commonwealth Honors Scholar. The project may take the form of research, critical or  philosophical analysis, computer program, performance, art exhibit, public service project, or  other original work making a significant contribution to the field of study. Through the APEX, the student will demonstrate the ability to work independently and innovate in a chosen field— precisely the quality sought by all employers and graduate school admissions committees.

There are three “tracks” to complete the APEX, all of which are outlined in this handbook.  Students are free to choose any track but should have a discussion with their APEX mentor and/or Honors academic advisor to choose the track that is most appropriate for the student’s  project and career/education plans. 

2. General requirements

Regardless of track, there are several general guidelines for the APEX. Track-specific guidelines  and rubrics will be discussed later in the handbook. All projects require the following: 

  • An individual and original creative/scholarly/experiential component. Students can work  in groups, but each student needs to have a clear individual contribution.
  •  A UMass Dartmouth faculty member to serve as the APEX mentor. Students will work  closely with their mentor in the design and completion of the project.
  • Submission of several forms, including a proposal form, a progress report, and a final  approval form. Additional details are included later in the handbook.
  • Registering for a minimum of three APEX credits through the Honors College or through  the major department (e.g., independent study credits, internship, etc.). Please consult  with the Honors College to determine if the departmental course qualifies.
  • A final written product that, at a minimum, provides an abstract, a comprehensive  scholarly background, a detailed summary and critical evaluation of the project, and  how the project represents a culmination of one’s skills and contributes to the field at  large. The nature of the final written product may differ depending on APEX track (see  section 2.4).
  • A public presentation of the project (e.g., a poster presentation at the annual Honors  College convocation, a publicly announced APEX defense, a presentation at a  professional conference, etc.).
Back to table of contents

2.1 General APEX learning outcomes

The APEX has three primary learning outcomes, which are listed below. Because student work  can vary depending on the track, the Honors College developed track-specific rubrics (see  Appendix A), which are based on these general learning outcomes.

  1. Develop rigorous scholarly inquiry skills
    1. Use a systematic approach in assessing evidence, data, context, and interpretations.
    2. Critically evaluate and critique the knowledge base within an area of inquiry.
    3. Identify gaps in understanding.
    4. Formulate and pursue original scholarly endeavors.
  2. 2. Promote creativity and divergent/convergent thinking skills
    1. Synthesize findings, ideas, and/or theories in innovative ways.
    2. Apply existing skills in different settings.
    3. Formulate solutions to novel problems.
  3. Hone oral and written communication skills
    1. Clearly explain (orally and in writing) findings, thoughts, and ideas to experts and non-experts.
    2. Respectfully and civilly debate positions with people who may disagree.

2.2 HON301: Research across the disciplines

The first step in the APEX is to determine which track to pursue and if the student needs to take  HON301. For most students, HON301 will be a required course and is a valuable experience  that helps them choose an APEX track, decide on a topic, and find a mentor. HON301 can be  waived on the APEX Proposal Form for students who are:

  • • already working in a research lab or on a larger project with faculty mentor commitment
  • • planning to complete the APEX as part of a major capstone course
  • • planning to pursue the internship/service track

Regardless of whether students take HON301, a proposal must be submitted (see section 4.1). If HON301 is waived, these credits must be substituted for 3 credits of an Honors elective as the requirement of 21 course credits plus 3 APEX credits to graduate from Honors is unchanged  by an HON301 substitution approval. 

Table 2.2: How to decide about taking HON301

Track Choose this option if I... then I... and I register for credits is...
Faculty commitment secured (Research or Exposition/Creative) am working on research or a creative project with a professor and want to continue the work for my APEX, or have defined such a project with a professor willing to work with me as an APEX mentor submit an APEX Proposal form with my mentor by the last day of finals of the semester prior to starting the APEX credits HON490 or an independent research course offered by my major department
Capstone am in a major that requires a senior capstone research project or thesis and intend to use that course for my APEX

submit an APEX Proposal Form with my capstone professor within the first 2 weeks of the semesters.

*Important: The APEX requires some independent work - please consult with the Honors college.

 the senior capstone course
Internship intend to do an internship and use the internship track for the APEX work with the Honors College Administrators to find an internships, identify a mentor, and explores APEX topic ideas. Students can also utilize the Career Center's Handshake platform to identify internship opportunities. Submit the APEX Proposal Form within the first two weeks of the internship. HON490

2.3 APEX credits and grading

Credits earned for work on the thesis/project cannot be counted toward the minimum 21  credits of Honors coursework required for graduation as a Commonwealth Honors Scholar. When enrolling for the first semester for which the student plans to earn APEX credit, they  should confer with their Honors academic advisor to determine which course to take. Students  can take three APEX credits if the work can be completed in one semester or six APEX credits if  it will take two semesters. The decision of whether to take three or six credits should be made  prior to taking the APEX credits. There should be a substantive reason to take six APEX credits.  In other words, students should not take another semester of APEX credits if the work that was  planned in the first semester was not completed.

If the work planned for HON 490 (or an equivalent APEX credit course) is incomplete at the end  of the semester, the student should receive a grade of incomplete until the work is completed.  All University policies on unfinished work and the assignment of incomplete grades apply.  Remember, HON 491 (or equivalent) may not be taken to complete unfinished work from HON  490 (or equivalent). If taking APEX credits within a course other than HON 490/491, the grading  will follow the approved policy for that course.

Grades for APEX work are determined by the APEX mentor. Grading policies, expectations, and  rubrics should be made clear to students prior to the beginning of the work, and preferably in  the APEX contract. Sample grading rubrics are available in Appendix A. APEX mentors for  students enrolled in HON490/491 should email the Honors College Dean the final course grade a minimum of one day before grades are due to the Registrar at the end of the semester. To fulfill the APEX requirement, students must earn a B or better in their APEX credits. If the  student does not earn a B, the APEX credits must be retaken.

There are several methods for earning APEX credits:

2.3.1 HON490/491

If the student is undertaking an interdisciplinary project, or if one’s major department does  not have suitable thesis/project or independent study courses, one may register for  HON490 (first semester) and HON491 (second semester, if needed). One must request a  permission number from the Honors Dean to enroll. The Honors Dean serves as the formal  instructor of record, but the APEX mentor supervises the work and determines the grade.

2.3.2 Department-specific independent study courses

Many departments have 400-level course numbers set aside for theses, projects, and/or  independent study. Credits earned in this way may also count toward the student’s  departmental graduation requirements. The APEX mentor serves as the course instructor  and assigns a grade at the end of each semester. It is important to note that departmental  thesis/project and independent study courses are not normally listed in COIN until a student  expresses the intention to take one of them and finds a faculty mentor willing to serve as  instructor. Once an APEX mentor is identified, the mentor and department chair will ask the  Registrar to create a section for the relevant semester.

2.3.3 Internship/clinical courses

Students can use an internship/clinical class to satisfy the APEX requirement if the  experience includes an individual and original scholarly endeavor. For example, a nursing  student can integrate the APEX into a clinical internship course, or a psychology student can  use a counseling placement as part of the APEX. They need simply to do a project in their  placement (qualitative or quantitative) or critical review based on that experience.

2.3.4 Capstone courses

A capstone course can also provide a foundation for an APEX. For instance, students in an  engineering capstone can add a component to the group capstone project that will be  conducted alongside, or as part of, the group project (e.g., add additional functionality, do  efficiency analyses, or user testing of the system). An English or Interior Architecture  capstone course that requires the development and completion of a creative work could  also count as the student’s APEX.

If the capstone course does not fully meet the requirements of the APEX, the student could  complete the work in an independent study course through the department or Honors (i.e.,  HON490). For example, if an illustration major completes a project for a capstone but the  project does not fully meet the APEX requirements, the student could continue the work  through an independent study or through HON490.

Back to table of contents

2.4 Written and oral requirements

Some APEX projects are entirely written, while others, such as those in the visual or performing  arts, consist of both written and non-written components (see Appendix B for past examples).  However, all APEXes require a written component, which demonstrates the track’s learning  objectives (see Appendix A for rubrics) and includes the following elements:

  • An abstract summarizing the project’s scholarly background, purpose, methodology or  work done, results, and concluding discussion and/or implications on the wider field
  • The purpose of the APEX, such as the question addressed, artistic goal, or purpose of the  internship/experience
  • A comprehensive scholarly review of what has been done before, such as the prior  literature on a research topic, an analysis of previous artistic works and traditions that  set the stage for the current APEX, or a detailed review and comparison of industry-wide  practices relevant to the internship. Please refer to APEX examples for models of  expected length, comprehensiveness, and format. Mentors can also recommend discipline-specific style and content resources (such as the APA Publication Manual)
  • A detailed written description of the student’s process, which may include illustrations  or other visual materials for creative work, or a formal methods section for scientific  investigations. In cases in which the APEX was a group project, the student must also clearly explain their individual contribution and work
  • Results of the investigation for traditional research, or description of the outcome or  product for other types of projects
  • A discussion section that summarizes the outcomes of the work and contextualizes it  with reference to the literature discussed in the background section. In the case of  projects intended to provide policy recommendations, a detailed narrative describing  the recommendation(s) and how they stem from the literature review and/or results of  the APEX work is required. Students should discuss limitations of the project (e.g.,  methods, generalizability) and suggestions for future work
  • An explanation and discussion of how the project represents a culmination of one’s skills  and contributes to the field at large. This component is required to prepare students to  communicate skills and intellectual process to employers and graduate schools

All APEX projects must be presented at least once in an appropriate public venue. This can  take the form of a traditional thesis defense before the student's committee, a public  performance or display, and/or conference presentation. All students are encouraged to  present their theses or projects in poster format at the annual Honors Convocation in April. The  Convocation poster presentation alone is sufficient to meet the Honors College requirements,  but the student’s mentor may require an additional presentation. In practice, many  Commonwealth Scholars present their work in more than one public venue prior to graduation.

Back to table of contents

2.5 The Faculty Mentor

The faculty mentor must be a member of the UMass Dartmouth faculty, and most often will be  a member of the student’s major department. Faculty members are not obligated to serve as  an APEX mentor, and they are often more inclined to supervise an APEX when the project is  related to their research interests or expertise. One approach to identifying a mentor is to  research faculty in the major department to determine who is doing work that is of interest and  ask if there is an ongoing research component the student can undertake for the APEX.  Students should remain open-minded and be willing to modify the APEX topic in consultation  with potential mentors.

2.6 Optional committee member(s)

Some projects may benefit from adding committee members to the project, who serve as  consultants to the student in addition to the primary mentor. This can be especially helpful if  the project is interdisciplinary or requires skills (such as statistical analysis, graphic design, or  programming) that may be outside the mentor’s primary areas of expertise. The addition of  committee members is not required for the APEX project, but is recommended in some cases, and may be needed as a capstone requirement if this track is chosen (i.e. PSY 498/499).

Back to table of contents

3. APEX tracks

3.1 Traditional research

For this track, “research” is broadly defined and can include scientific experiments, critical  literature evaluations, human subject research, etc. The scope and length of the written paper  should reflect the norm for undergraduate theses in the major field, as long as it meets the  requirements explained in section 2.4. It should be written in a professional or academic style  characteristic of the subject matter or discipline of the thesis (e.g., APA or MLS style), and it  should contain documentation that is appropriate to the field. The APEX mentor will help  determine what is appropriate.

3.2 Creative work/performance/expression

This track is often appropriate for creative endeavors such as public art installations, musical  performances, art exhibits, screenplays, poetry, and fiction writing. Marketing or business plans  are also appropriate. This track requires a written APEX paper that will vary in content  depending on the nature of the work. For a performance or art piece, it might be a description  of the problem space the work addresses, a review of work related to or that influenced the  topic, and an explanation of the method and solution (in addition to submission of the work  itself). It should be of sufficient scope and quality to demonstrate competence in the field.

3.3 Applied/service/internship

This track is for students who are doing work in an applied setting such as internships or  community service. This track allows students to explore a question in the "real world" (e.g.,  the internship site). Depending on the placement location, the information gathering can be  done in the archives of a museum, interviews with company staff, questionnaires to customers  or employees, surveys to employees or executives within the relevant industry, outcomes of  work the student engaged in during the placement, or other activities. Another option is to  research a topic sufficiently to develop a new course in the student’s major. Such projects  should produce a complete syllabus with learning outcomes, lesson plans, readings,  assignments, and assessments. The methods in this track are flexible but must have some  original scholarship to be written into an APEX paper. How the paper is structured (e.g.,  chapters addressing different learning outcomes, or an introduction, project description and  outcomes) is up to the student and mentor as long as it meets the requirements explained in section 2.4.

Students who choose this track are required to meet with an Honors College administrator  (either the Dean or the Faculty Director) as soon as the internship track is chosen. During this  meeting, the following will be discussed:

  • The student’s interests in an internship or applied experience
  • Potential faculty mentors and optional Committee Members (if not already identified)
  • Goals and potential research questions for the placement (finalized with APEX mentor)
  • Detailed plans
  • The ApexThe ApexTimeline of the internship and APEX work
Back to table of contents

4. The APEX process

The completion of the APEX should not be overwhelming. The Honors team and your mentor  are all here to support you. In this section, the process is broken down into several parts to  guide students and help keep them on track. Many of these parts involve filling out an online form, all of which can be found on the Honors College APEX website. There is also a table with  the relevant due dates in section 4.6 of this guide.

4.1 APEX proposal (Due dates vary, see Table 4.1)

The proposal provides a brief description of the proposed project, and the course(s) and  semester(s) in which the work will be completed. The student’s mentor must approve and  electronically sign the proposal before submitting it to the Honors College. Specifically, the  proposal should include the following:

  1. A narrative containing:
    • Background information with citations and a bibliography
    • Research question(s)/thesis statement/problem statement
    • Objectives of the proposed project
    • Description of the proposed work AND if the student believes it will take one or two  semesters. If two semesters are required, indicate which part(s) of the work plan will  occur in the first and second semesters
    • Explanation of how the project represents a culmination of one’s skills

      The proposal is similar to the Office of Undergraduate Research grant application and  the Honors APEX Funding application, making it easier to apply for funding if needed.
  2. A work timeline. The online proposal form includes a template for a timeline, which  should be modified to fit the project. Students should work closely with their APEX  mentor to determine the goals and timeline. Although the template is not binding, it  should be well thought out. Students also need to consider what training might be  required. For example, for students doing human subject research, an IRB proposal must be submitted and CITI training is required. See the Additional Information section below  for more details and Appendix B for timeline samples by College. Again, students should  work with their mentor to determine what is required. The timeline should be consulted  when completing the APEX Progress Report when enrolled in APEX credits (see section  4.2).
  3. A student/mentor responsibility agreement. The online proposal form also contains a  sample template for the responsibilities of the student and mentor. It is meant to be  revised by each faculty/student team to fit the demands of the student’s APEX project.

 

Table 4.1: APEX proposal due dates

Track Proposal due date
Faculty commitment secured (Research or Exposition/Creative) By the end of finals of the semester prior to taking APEX credits
Capstone By the end of the second week of the semester in which the capstone course is being taken
Internship By the end of the second week of the internship
HON 301 (Research or Exposition/Creative) By the end of the 13th week of the semester

4.2 APEX Progress Report (Due on the Friday of the 8th week of the semester by 5pm)

The progress report is a way for the Honors College to help students stay on track. The progress report should include the following information (if relevant):

  • Changes to the methods or planned final product
  • Major timeline changes (refer to the timeline in the APEX proposal to make this  determination)
  • IRB submission/approval status (if relevant)
  • Progress on data collection efforts
  • Whether the completion date will be significantly changed from the proposal’s  projected completion date
Back to table of contents

4.3 APEX Final approval form (Due no later than the last day of final exams)

After the APEX has been written, presented, and approved by the APEX mentor and/or  committee, the student must submit the final approval form. The student needs to report the  date and place of the public presentation (often the Honors Convocation Poster Session), the  APEX credits used to complete the project and when they were taken (e.g., HON490 in Spring  20xx), the signatures of the mentor and applicable committee members, and a copy of the final  paper (see section 2.4). The final approval form needs to be submitted to the Honors college by  the last day of finals of the semester in which the student completes the project.

4.4 APEX Topic revision form (only if needed)

The APEX Revision Form only needs to be completed if there is a major change in the APEX  topic. Submission is not required for relatively minor changes (e.g., modifying measures, slight  changes in wording of research questions, etc.). To complete the revision form, a revised  proposal and timeline need to be submitted. If there is any question whether a revision form is  needed, please reach out to the Honors College for assistance.

Table 4.5: Summary of required forms and due dates

Track Proposal due date Progress report due date Final approval due date
Faculty commitment secured (Research or Exposition/Creative) By the end of finals of the semester prior to taking APEX credits 8th week of the semester in which APEX credits are being taken Last day of final exams
Capstone By the end of the second eek of the semester in which the capstone course is being taken 8th week of the semester in which APEX credits are being taken Last day of final exams
Internship By the end of the second week of the internship 8th week of the semester in which APEX credits are being taken Last day of final exams
HON 201 (Research or Exposition/Creative) By the end of the 13th week of the semester 8th week of the semester in which APEX credits are being taken Last day of final exams

INSRT TABLE

Back to table of contents

5. Additional Information

5.1 Institutional review and ethics training requirements

State and Federal law require that all human research using humans or animals undergo formal  review by the institution's Institutional Review Board (IRB) and undergo University ethics  training. To determine whether the APEX project requires IRB review, please consider the  following guidance adapted from the DHHS (Department of Health and Human Services).

A human or animal subject means a human or living vertebrate animal about whom an investigator (whether professional or student) is conducting research:

  1. Obtains information or biospecimens through intervention or interaction with the  individual, and uses, studies, or analyzes the information or biospecimens; or
  2. Obtains, uses, studies, analyzes, or generates identifiable private information or  identifiable biospecimens.

Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing, and  evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge.

For a study to be exempt from IRB review and approval, it would have to be deemed either not  human or vertebrate animal subjects or not research per DHHS. If it is considered human  subjects research per the above definitions, the proposal requires IRB approval before the  implementation of data collection and all personnel must complete required CITI trainings.

5.2 Collaborative projects

It is possible to collaborate with another student on an APEX project. This is encouraged if the  projects are related in a fundamental way. For example, an engineering student who develops a  new technology may partner with a business student, who might develop a funding pitch and  business model to monetize the invention. Each student is still required to produce an  independent APEX paper and presentation in such a case.

5.3 Potential funding opportunities

Some students might require funding for things such as special equipment or material,  participant compensation, or access to certain resources. Two of the primary sources of funding  are the Office of Undergraduate Research and the Honors APEX Support Grant. Please look at  the APEX Funding Opportunities on the UMass Dartmouth Honors College website for more  information. The APEX Support Grant application is online, but a copy that allows you to see  what information is required is provided in Appendix C.

Back to table of contents

Appendix A: Rubrics - final paper

A.1 Traditional research track

1. Literature, background, and justification

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Thesis presented within an academic framework
  • Comprehensive and relevant literature review included
  • Justification and background (e.g., historical and contemporary contexts, assumptions/biases, 
    and/or ethical considerations are clear and sound
  • Clear articulation of the gap in current understanding/state of the field

2. Research question or creative challenge

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Unique research question/issue/creative challenge identified
  • Goals/objectives/hypotheses are explicit
  • Questions and hypotheses flow logically from literature review and background
  • Predictions can be tested using described methods

3. Methodology/approach

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Methodology/approach is appropriate to disciplinary/interdisciplinary focus
  • Topic is contextualized among sources and materials cited
  • Demonstrates understanding of the content, tools, and structures in the field
  • Methods appropriately test predictions/hypotheses
  • Study design is appropriate to test predictions/hypotheses
  • Appropriate analytical approaches used (e.g., proper statistics are used)

4. Results

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Results are displayed in appropriate manner in both text and graphic form
  • Appropriate field-specific reporting guidelines are followed (e.g., APA style)
  • Results follow logically from background and methods
  • Analytical plan is clearly stated

5. Conclusions, implications, and consequences

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Conclusions, qualifications, and consequences, including value of thesis, are presented
  • Significance of what was discovered, learned, or created is demonstrated
  • Assertions are qualified and well-supported
  • Demonstrates independent and critical thought
  • Critical analysis of evidence/results
  • Explain results and place them in the context of current understanding
  • Report on if results support/do not support hypotheses

6. Writing

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas
  • Any errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics, and/or punctuation are minimal
  • Organization is clear and effective
  • Sources and citations are used correctly
  • Citations and references are in appropriate standard
Back to table of contents

A.2 Creative/expression track

1. Literature, background, and justification

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Project reflects familiarity with historical and contemporary texts and contexts, reflected in a 
    thorough literature review
  • Literature review provides an evidence-based and critical evaluation of the works cited, in 
    language appropriate to the discipline

2. Research question or creative challenge

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Clear statement about what questions the work explores
  • Clear statement about why the questions matter, within the context of the work explored in 
    the literature review

3. Methodology/approach: development

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Methodology/approach is appropriate to thematic and disciplinary/interdisciplinary focus
  • Topic is contextualized among sources and materials cited
  • Multiple perspectives are considered
  • Demonstrates understanding of the content, tools, and structures in the field

4. Methodology/approach: implementation

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Symbolic and/or quantitative tools are utilized effectively
  • Breadth and depth of the work are sufficient to address the research question
  • Demonstrates understanding of professional standards

5. Conclusions, implications, and consequences

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Conclusions, qualifications, reflection on the creative process, and value of the thesis, are presented
  • Significance of what was discovered, learned, or created is discussed
  • Assertions are qualified and well supported
  • Demonstrates independent and critical thought

6. Writing

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas
  • Any errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics, and/or punctuation are minimal
  • Organization is clear and effective
  • Sources and citations are used correctly
  • Citations and references are in appropriate standard
Back to table of contents

A.3 Service/Internship Track

1. Literature, background, and justification

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Thesis is framed within an academic framework
  • Comprehensive and relevant scholarly review of sources and materials included
  • Justification and background (e.g., historical and contemporary contexts, assumptions, biases, or ethical considerations) is clear and sound

2. Scholarly question or challenge

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Unique question or challenge identified
  • Goals/objectives are explicit
  • Questions or challenges are logically connected to the scholarly review and background

3. Methodology/approach: development

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Methodology/approach is appropriate to disciplinary/interdisciplinary focus and organizational context
  • Topic is contextualized among sources and materials cited
  • Multiple perspectives are considered
  • Demonstrates understanding of the content, tools, and structures in the field

4. Outcomes

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  •  Formative or summative outcomes are identified
  • Outcomes reflect methodology
  • Consideration of barriers, context, and demands
  • Connect scholarly review with actual experiences

5. Conclusions, implications, and consequences

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  •  Significance of what was discovered, learned, or created is demonstrated
  • Assertions are qualified and well supported
  • Demonstrates independent and critical thought
  • Identifies key findings, potential collaborators, and stakeholders
  • Future directions (e.g., what could the next student do to continue work, how could findings be implemented in a larger setting, etc.)
  • Self-reflection
    • Identify successes and what the student would change if done again
    • Identify any possible biases (systemic or personal)
    • Identify any challenges in terms of processes, co-workers, or collaborators
    • Consider how experience is relevant to the student’s future and career

6. Writing

Rubric scoring:

  1. Poor
  2. Fair
  3. Satisfactory
  4. Very good
  5. Excellent

Criteria:

  • Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas
  • Any errors in grammar, spelling, mechanics, and/or punctuation are minimal
  • Organization is clear and effective
  • Sources and citations are used correctly
  • Citations and references are in appropriate standard
Back to table of contents

Appendix B

Sample proposals and final projects by track

The Honors College retains a selection of past redacted samples of APEX Proposals (containing timelines and responsibility examples). For access to these samples, please contact the Honors College. Paper samples are also available on request. 

Back to table of contents

Appendix C: APEX Forms, Templates, and Presentation Guidelines

All Honors Forms must be submitted electronically via DocuSign. Links are posted on the Honors College website, and below for your convenience. For reference, a copy of each form is included on the following pages. Do not print and submit paper copies.

Proposal, progress, and final approval forms

APEX modifications (if needed)

APEX funding opportunities

Presenting your APEX

For detailed information regarding your APEX Poster Presentation, please see our APEX Poster Design Guidelines and the APEX Poster Template.

Review samples of documentation required for APEX presentations (PDF)

Back to table of contents